LGBTQ Research in Physical Education: Is the Tide Really Rising?

LGBTQ Research in Physical Education: Is the Tide Really Rising?

Landi and colleagues conducted an exhaustive search of nine databases, screening 230 abstracts to curate 76 manuscripts for analysis. Empirical research (n = 37) surged after 2012, with 40 % of studies published in the 20122018 band—a clear uptick that justifies the “rising tide” metaphor.​​ 

However, the tide looks thinner on closer inspection. Research journals host 81 % of empirical papers, yet only 33 % of those appear in PE-specific journals; Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy and Sport, Education & Society together publish 75 % of the PE journal content. The Physical Educator and Quest are the only US PE journals to feature an LGBTQ study in the sample.​​ 

Bridging Research and Practice in Physical Education: A Conversation with Dr. Aaron Beighle

Bridging Research and Practice in Physical Education: A Conversation with Dr. Aaron Beighle

In a recent podcast conversation, I had the chance to sit down with Dr. Aaron Beighle from the University of Kentucky—an influential voice in physical education who has spent his career connecting research to practice. Our discussion ranged from the evolution of physical education, to the role of teacher preparation, to the ever-present challenge of ensuring PE remains relevant in today’s schools.

Bringing Fitness Technology Into PE: Lessons from Recent Research

Bringing Fitness Technology Into PE: Lessons from Recent Research

In a recent conversation with Dr. Sean Fullerton from Towson University, we dug into a timely and practical question for physical educators: how do teachers view and use fitness-based technology in their classes? The discussion centered on a study examining the adoption of PLT4M, a fitness software designed to track, support, and enhance student learning in physical education.

Why Do Middle Schoolers Sour on Physical Education? A Student Voice Look at Attitudes, Barriers & Fixes

Middle school is the tipping point where many young people decide PE is “for me” — or a class they simply endure. Phillips, Marttinen, Mercier and Gibbone give that turning point a microphone in Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Physical Education: A Qualitative Look, using two years of focus group interviews (65 students, Grades 5–8) to uncover why attitudes drop and what educators can do about it. Below are the key takeaways, followed by the headline findings from the study’s Results and Discussion sections. 

Key takeaways  at a glance 

  1. Curriculum sameness breeds boredom. Rerunning the same sports units each year desensitised enthusiasm; students called lessons “mad boring” and predictable. 

  1. Competition culture alienates many girls and some boys. An overemphasis on winning, aggressive play and “ballhogging” discouraged participation and reinforced gender gaps. 

  1. Fitness testing backfires when purpose is unclear. Most children could not connect pushups or mile times to life outside PE, and being evaluated publicly felt humiliating. 

  1. Sweat, changing time and body worries are huge social barriers. Especially for girls, limited lockerroom time, ruined hairstyles and lingering odour pushed them to opt out or underperform. 

  1. The “easy A” myth undermines learning. When grades hinge on dressing out and showing up, students equate effort—not understanding or skill—with success. 

  1. Teacher personality matters, but instruction matters more. Students praised “nice” teachers yet lamented minimal feedback, opaque grading and “rollouttheball” lessons. 

 

What the study found 

1. Curriculum drives attitude downturns 

Three subthemes captured why repetition hurt attitudes: lessons felt repetitive and boring; an overemphasis on competition privileged aggressive players; and fitnesstesting activities were seen as purposeless public spectacles — “Why am I on display?” ​ 

2. Social factors magnify disengagement 

Focus groups repeatedly linked negative feelings to sweating in the middle of the day and rushing to change clothes. Girls reported skipping participation to keep hair, makeup or a birthday outfit intact; boys admitted noticing this and labelling PEaverse peers “lazy” or “soft.” ​ 

3. Perceptions of teachers and grading feed the “easy A” loop 

Students liked friendly teachers, but many said little was actually taught. Homework readings were rarely revisited, tests felt irrelevant, and one pupil who skipped all written assignments still held a 90+ average. The message: comply, don’t learn, to earn an A. ​ 

 

What the authors conclude 

  • Affective hurdles (fun, enjoyment)—boredom, hostile competition, embarrassment—lower the feeling component of attitude. 

  • Cognitive hurdles (usefulness, importance)—unclear learning goals, purposeless fitness tests, soft grading—undermine the thinking component. 
    Together they spiral into declining overall attitudes toward PE in Grades 6–8. ​ 

 

Practical implications for teachers & schools 

  • Diversify the yearly menu. Rotate novel activities (e.g., Spikeball, parkour, dance modules) and let students codesign units to restore curiosity. 

  • Dial back zerosum competition. Use smallsided or cooperative formats; separate skillbuilding from game play; offer girlsonly or choicebased options when appropriate. 

  • Put fitness testing in a learning frame. Teach why cardio fitness matters, emphasise personal progress, and collect scores privately. 

  • Fix the sweattime crunch. Schedule PE earlier or provide extended changing blocks, deodorant stations and optional freshair cooldowns. 

  • Grade what you value. Tie marks to demonstrate knowledge, skills and personal goal-setting rather than mere dress or attendance. 

  • Model reflective, student-centered teaching. Show visible planning, give actionable feedback and solicit ongoing student voice—key levers the study identifies for rebuilding trust and relevance. ​ 

Bottom line: When middle school students explain why they tune out, the fixes become clearer. Listening to their voices can transform PE from “the easy A” to an engaging course that equips all kids for active, healthy lives. 

 Full Article:
Phillips, S., Marttinen, R., Mercier, K., & Gibbone, A. (2020). Middle school students’ perceptions of physical education: A qualitative look. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0085    

This blog post was written with the assistance of AI to support clarity and accessibility. It is intended to help disseminate and discuss research findings with a broader audience. However, for the most accurate and reliable information—including conclusions and practical applications—please refer to the original peer-reviewed publication on which this blog is based. The peer-reviewed article remains the most authoritative source. 

Empowering Social Justice in Teacher Education: Two Free Toolkits You Should Know About

Empowering Social Justice in Teacher Education: Two Free Toolkits You Should Know About

If you're a teacher educator passionate about equity, inclusion, and social justice—or even if you're just getting started in this space—you’re going to want to bookmark this.

In a recent episode of our podcast, I was joined by three amazing colleagues from the University of Limerick in Ireland: Prof. Elaine Murtagh, Dr. Carmen Barquero Ruiz, and Dr. Antonio Calderón. Together, they’ve helped create not one, but two freely available, research-informed toolkits to support social justice in teacher education. And honestly? They’re gold.

Let me walk you through what these toolkits are, where they came from, and why they’re game-changers.

Rethinking Physical Education: How Teachers Are Positioned in Models-Based Practice

Rethinking Physical Education: How Teachers Are Positioned in Models-Based Practice

What happens when PE teachers are viewed as technicians versus craftspeople? That’s a central question behind a recent Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy article co-authored by Robin Fjellner, Dean Barker and Valeria Varea from Örebro University in Sweden. I sat down with Robin on the podcast to dive deep into his scoping review titled "How Physical Education Teachers Are Positioned in Models Scholarship."

“So, What Is the Point of PE?” – Unpacking Purpose, Practice, and Pedagogy in Physical Education By Aussie Book Club (Brendan SueSee, Dave Robinson & Michael Davies)

“So, What Is the Point of PE?” – Unpacking Purpose, Practice, and Pedagogy in Physical Education By Aussie Book Club (Brendan SueSee, Dave Robinson & Michael Davies)

In this month’s Aussie Book Club, Brendan SueSee, Dave “Robbo” Robinson, and Michael “Mickey D” Davies dug into a provocative read from Sweden, asking a very real question many teachers and students have asked before:

“Why don’t you really learn anything in PE?”

To Use or Not to Use? Artificial Intelligence (ChatBots) in PETE/HETE.

To Use or Not to Use? Artificial Intelligence (ChatBots) in PETE/HETE.

The purpose of this blog is twofold.

1.     First, we aim to summarize the conversation that occurred during the PETE Collaborative virtual meeting that occurred on October 5, 2023, entitled To Use or Not to Use? Artificial Intelligence (ChatBots) in PETE/HETE.

2.     Second, we have compiled an initial bank of resources on the topic, as offered by call participants and suggested by the PETE Collaborative organizing group.

Generalization of Participation in Fitness Activities from Physical Education to Lunch Recess by Gender and Skill Level

Generalization of Participation in Fitness Activities from Physical Education to Lunch Recess by Gender and Skill Level

This blog discusses the article Generalization of Participation in Fitness Activities From Physical Education to Lunch Recess by Gender and Skill Level. We talk about the effects of a recess sport education fitness season on students’ participation in fitness activities from PE to lunch recess by gender and skill level.